Overview

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND BRIDGES

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

17.3

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

62.3 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

86.5 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is moderate, 62.3%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND BRIDGES

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 7.4 7.8 6.0 4.6 4.8 6.4 6.2 43.2 85.9% 0.9
Article, other NA 1.0 NA NA NA NA NA 1.0 100.0% 1.0
Conference paper, peer review 5.3 4.7 3.5 3.4 4.6 5.2 9.0 35.6 33.7% 0.8
Conference paper, other 1.0 0.8 2.6 1.4 0.6 0.7 NA 7.1 0.0% 0.2
Chapter in book NA 0.3 NA NA NA NA NA 0.3 0.0% 1.0
Report 1.0 NA 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 6.3 0.0% 0.0
Licentiate thesis NA NA NA NA NA 2.0 1.0 3.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 20 19 17 12 11 12 14 105 87.6% 1
Article, other NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA 1 100.0% 1
Conference paper, peer review 13 9 9 6 10 14 13 74 39.2% 1
Conference paper, other 2 2 7 3 2 1 NA 17 0.0% 0
Chapter in book NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA 1 0.0% 1
Report 1 NA 2 2 1 2 2 10 0.0% 0
Licentiate thesis NA NA NA NA NA 2 1 3 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND BRIDGES

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 9.4 33.8 3.6 3.7 39.3%
2015 10.2 37.0 3.6 4.0 38.7%
2016 5.9 17.4 3.0 0.6 9.9%
2017 6.2 16.8 2.7 1.8 29.6%
2018 6.2 20.9 3.4 1.6 26.0%
Total 37.9 126.0 3.3 11.7 30.8%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 18.3 1.28 2.5 13.8%
2015-2017 16.8 1.06 1.4 8.4%
2016-2018 14.2 0.96 1.3 9.3%
2017-2019 13.2 0.89 0.6 4.7%
Total 31.5 1.12 3.1 10.0%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 14 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 61.6%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 30 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 83.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND BRIDGES

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 18.3 1.24 3.4 18.5%
2015-2017 16.5 1.19 3.3 20.2%
2016-2018 13.9 1.09 2.4 17.5%
2017-2019 12.9 1.05 1.9 14.4%
2018-2020 14.7 1.06 2.0 13.6%
Total 36.8 1.15 5.8 15.7%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 30 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 83.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND BRIDGES

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 50 14 28.0% 23 46.0%
2015-2017 45 14 31.1% 23 51.1%
2016-2018 37 16 43.2% 18 48.6%
2017-2019 30 13 43.3% 11 36.7%
2018-2020 31 12 38.7% 12 38.7%
Total 92 30 32.6% 40 43.5%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 30 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 83.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Ireland 10 10 0 0 0 3.6
France 13 13 0 0 0 3.0
Italy 7 7 0 0 0 2.7
United Kingdom 7 7 0 0 0 1.8
Belgium 7 7 0 0 0 1.6
Spain 4 4 0 0 0 1.4
Netherlands 3 3 0 0 0 1.4
Switzerland 3 3 0 0 0 0.6
Canada 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
China 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
India 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.3

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
ELU Konsult Company Sweden 12 12 0 0 0 7.1
Swedish Transport Administration Other Public Sweden 11 11 0 0 0 6.3
Nynas Company Sweden 8 8 0 0 0 3.1
Tyrens AB Company Sweden 6 6 0 0 0 2.4
Roughan and O’Donovan (ROD) Company Ireland 6 6 0 0 0 2.4
Skanska AB Company Sweden 6 6 0 0 0 2.0
University of Trento University Italy 5 5 0 0 0 1.7
European University of Brittany University France 6 6 0 0 0 1.6
Trinity College, Dublin University Ireland 3 3 0 0 0 1.5
Aston University University United Kingdom 5 5 0 0 0 1.4
University College Dublin University Ireland 4 4 0 0 0 1.1
Sweco AB Company Sweden 4 4 0 0 0 1.1
Catholic University of Leuven University Belgium 3 3 0 0 0 1.1
Politecnico di Milano University Italy 2 2 0 0 0 1.0
ViaCon AB Company Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 1.0
Université Bretagne-Loire University France 3 3 0 0 0 0.8
Jaume I University University Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.8
FOLKBRO Company Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
ÅF Group Company Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
University College Cork University Ireland 3 3 0 0 0 0.6
Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa) Institute Switzerland 3 3 0 0 0 0.6
Ramboll Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Lyon University France 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
University of Waterloo University Canada 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Wroclaw University of Science and Technology University Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Polytechnic University of Hauts-de-France University France 3 3 0 0 0 0.5
Toyota Company Belgium 3 3 0 0 0 0.5
SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
University of Cantabria University Spain 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.4
Aalborg University University Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Breinlinger Engineers Company Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Delft University of Technology University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Guangdong University of Technology (GDUT) University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Community of Universities and Institutions Lille Nord de France University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Dalian Maritime University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
ETH Zurich University Switzerland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Imperial College London University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Indian Institute of Science University India 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Indian Institutes of Technology University India 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Tyndall National Institute Institute Ireland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Technical University of Madrid University Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
French Institute of Science and Technology for Transport Institute France 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Kuwait Petroleum Research & Technology B.V. Company Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO) Other Public Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Nynas Bitumen Belgium Company Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Nottingham University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Western Research Institute Institute United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1

Open Access

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND BRIDGES

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 25 7 0 0 7 0 18 28.0%
2015 28 4 3 0 1 0 24 14.3%
2016 21 6 0 1 5 0 15 28.6%
2017 18 8 4 1 2 1 10 44.4%
2018 14 3 1 0 2 0 11 21.4%
2019 16 8 2 2 2 2 8 50.0%
2020 15 9 2 4 3 0 6 60.0%
Total 137 45 12 8 22 3 92 32.8%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND BRIDGES

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 11.9 283.9 23.8 3.8 31.7%
2015 12.0 149.7 12.5 3.2 26.8%
2016 9.3 93.4 10.1 3.7 40.2%
2017 7.6 60.9 8.1 0.2 3.3%
2018 6.4 36.8 5.8 1.8 27.4%
2019 8.6 24.9 2.9 4.9 56.6%
2020 12.9 14.0 1.1 8.0 61.7%
Total 68.7 663.7 9.7 25.6 37.3%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 17 (full counted) publications with good Scopus coverage (at least 77.1%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 29.5 1.14 4.0 13.7%
2015-2017 25.7 1.01 1.8 6.9%
2016-2018 21.8 0.97 1.5 7.0%
2017-2019 20.9 0.88 1.6 7.7%
Total 50.4 1.03 5.7 11.2%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 58 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 82.7%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 23.3 1.56 15.5 66.4%
2015-2017 22.3 1.45 13.5 60.6%
2016-2018 17.7 1.52 11.6 65.5%
2017-2019 16.0 1.54 10.9 68.2%
2018-2020 15.3 1.75 11.8 76.6%
Total 45.3 1.59 30.8 68.0%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 58 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 82.7%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 83 12 14.5% 33 39.8%
2015-2017 70 11 15.7% 31 44.3%
2016-2018 58 14 24.1% 26 44.8%
2017-2019 53 8 15.1% 23 43.4%
2018-2020 59 7 11.9% 26 44.1%
Total 160 22 13.8% 66 41.2%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 53 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 87.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row